[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <814f3c16-0cc6-f256-f9a8-4678469be2d6@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:56:34 +0100
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>
To: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: samsung: update CPU clk registration
On 15.10.2021 21:05, Will McVicker wrote:
> Convert the remaining exynos clock drivers to use
> samsung_clk_register_cpu() or if possible use
> samsung_cmu_register_one(). With this we can now make
> exynos_register_cpu_clock() a static function so that future CPU clock
> registration changes will use the samsung common clock driver.
>
> The main benefit of this change is that it standardizes the CPU clock
> registration for the samsung clock drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will McVicker<willmcvicker@...gle.com>
Thank you for working on this, patch applied to clk/samsung for-next.
Thanks Krzysztof for review and testing.
Regards,
Sylwester
Powered by blists - more mailing lists