linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 1/7] PCI: brcmstb: Fix function return value handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211119220756.18628-2-jim2101024@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:07:48 -0500
From:   Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
To:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com,
        james.quinlan@...adcom.com
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
        BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
        BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/7] PCI: brcmstb: Fix function return value handling

Do at least a dev_err() on some calls to reset_control_rearm() and
brcm_phy_stop().  In some cases it may not make sense to return this error
value "above" as doing so will cause more trouble than is warranted.

Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 1fc7bd49a7ad..9ed79ddb6a83 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -1146,11 +1146,23 @@ static int brcm_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	int ret;
 
 	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
-	ret = brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
-	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
+	/*
+	 * If brcm_phy_stop() returns an error, just dev_err(). If we
+	 * return the error it will cause the suspend to fail and this is a
+	 * forgivable offense that will probably be erased on resume.
+	 */
+	if (brcm_phy_stop(pcie))
+		dev_err(dev, "Could not stop phy for suspend\n");
+
+	ret = reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Could not rearm rescal reset\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
@@ -1161,7 +1173,9 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
 	int ret;
 
 	base = pcie->base;
-	clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1202,8 +1216,10 @@ static void __brcm_pcie_remove(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 {
 	brcm_msi_remove(pcie);
 	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
-	brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
-	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
+	if (brcm_phy_stop(pcie))
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "Could not stop phy\n");
+	if (reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal))
+		dev_err(pcie->dev, "Could not rearm rescal reset\n");
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1