linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Pin task-stack in __get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:26:24 +0800
From:   Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Holger Hoffst??tte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Pin task-stack in __get_wchan()



On 11/19/21 6:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:02:50PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> 
>> This implementation is very similar to stack_trace_save_tsk(), maybe we
>> can just move stack_trace_save_tsk() out of CONFIG_STACKTRACE and reuse
>> it.
> 
> No, we want to move away from the stack_trace_*() API because it has
> very unclear semantics and various arch implementations differ in
> details.
> 
> There's a patch that untangles arch_stack_walk*() from CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> and we can eventually use that.
> 

Got it.

-- 
Thanks,
Qi