[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95ceaa12-81a0-09bf-dde3-b89179eee4cc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:42:27 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] KVM: X86: Always set gpte_is_8_bytes when direct
map
On 2021/11/19 18:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/19/21 11:30, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> Since 13, and 14 is queued, could you also queue this one and I will
>> do the rename separately in the next patchset. I found that the
>> intent of this patch is hidden in the lengthened squashed patch (of
>> this patch and the renaming patch).
>
> Then you can do the renaming first?
>
Then I would prefer to make the code match the name for the first time
when the name is introduced, which means it would be a squashed patch.
I will not fuss about it and will send the squashed patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists