[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZeAohkzXVQ7Nd2Z@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:46:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Steven Noonan <steven@...vesoftware.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/22] cpufreq: amd: introduce a new amd pstate driver
to support future processors
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:30:46PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> +static inline int pstate_enable(bool enable)
> +{
> + return wrmsrl_safe(MSR_AMD_CPPC_ENABLE, enable ? 1 : 0);
Strictly speaking that ?: is superfluous, a _Bool when cast to scalar
type will have exactly that value.
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists