lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:55:08 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+662448179365dddc1880@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        xieyongji@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15] block: Add a helper to validate the block size

On 2021/11/19 8:57, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
> 
> From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
> 
> There are some duplicated codes to validate the block
> size in block drivers. This limitation actually comes
> from block layer, so this patch tries to add a new block
> layer helper for that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026144015.188-2-xieyongji@bytedance.com
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/blkdev.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 683aee365420..5b03795ae33b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,14 @@ struct blk_keyslot_manager;
>   */
>  #define BLKCG_MAX_POLS		6
>  
> +static inline int blk_validate_block_size(unsigned int bsize)
> +{
> +	if (bsize < 512 || bsize > PAGE_SIZE || !is_power_of_2(bsize))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  typedef void (rq_end_io_fn)(struct request *, blk_status_t);
>  
>  /*
> 

But where is this used in 5.15 ? I do not see any callers for this.
So why backport it ?

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ