[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211119150612.jhsvsbzisvux2lga@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:06:12 +0100
From: Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release
interfaces
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 07:14:10PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The singleton group requirement for iommu_attach/detach_device() was
> added by below commit:
>
> commit 426a273834eae65abcfc7132a21a85b3151e0bce
> Author: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> Date: Thu May 28 18:41:30 2015 +0200
>
> iommu: Limit iommu_attach/detach_device to devices with their own group
>
> This patch changes the behavior of the iommu_attach_device
> and iommu_detach_device functions. With this change these
> functions only work on devices that have their own group.
> For all other devices the iommu_group_attach/detach
> functions must be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>
> Joerg,can you please shed some light on the background of this
> requirement? Does above idea of transition from singleton group
> to group with single driver bound make sense to you?
This change came to be because the iommu_attach/detach_device()
interface doesn't fit well into a world with iommu-groups. Devices
within a group are by definition not isolated between each other, so
they must all be in the same address space (== iommu_domain). So it
doesn't make sense to allow attaching a single device within a group to
a different iommu_domain.
I know that in theory it is safe to allow devices within a group to be
in different domains because there iommu-groups catch multiple
non-isolation cases:
1) Devices behind a non-ACS capable bridge or multiple functions
of a PCI device. Here it is safe to put the devices into
different iommu-domains as long as all affected devices are
controlled by the same owner.
2) Devices which share a single request-id and can't be
differentiated by the IOMMU hardware. These always need to be
in the same iommu_domain.
To lift the single-domain-per-group requirement the iommu core code
needs to learn the difference between the two cases above.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists