linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Docs: Fixes link to I2C specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4c16a9f5-3728-5377-1286-001b1b362bb1@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:40:07 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Deep Majumder <deep@...tmail.in>, wsa@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Docs: Fixes link to I2C specification

On 11/18/21 10:14 PM, Deep Majumder wrote:
> The link to the I2C specification is broken and is replaced in this
> patch by one that points to Rev 6 (2014) of the specification.
> Although `https://www.nxp.com" hosts the Rev 7 (2021) of this
> specification, it is behind a login-wall and thus cannot be used.

I don't quite get the "cannot be used" part.
I created a free login and downloaded this spec,
so yes, it's a hassle, but why can it not be used?


> Thus, an additional link has been added (which doesn't require a login)
> and the NXP official docs link has been updated. The additional link is
> not the Wayback Machine link since it seems that the PDF has not been
> archived.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deep Majumder <deep@...tmail.in>
> ---
>   Documentation/i2c/summary.rst | 8 +++++---
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> index 136c4e333be7..3395e2e46d9c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> @@ -11,9 +11,11 @@ systems.  Some systems use variants that don't meet branding requirements,
>   and so are not advertised as being I2C but come under different names,
>   e.g. TWI (Two Wire Interface), IIC.
>   
> -The official I2C specification is the `"I2C-bus specification and user
> -manual" (UM10204) <https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/UM10204.pdf>`_
> -published by NXP Semiconductors.
> +The official I2C specification (revision 7) is the `"I2C-bus specification and user
> +manual" (UM10204) <https://www.nxp.com/webapp/Download?colCode=UM10204&location=null>`_
> +published by NXP Semiconductors. However, you need to log-in to the site to
> +access the PDF. An older version of the specification (revision 6) is available
> +`here <https://www.pololu.com/file/0J435/UM10204.pdf>`_.
>   
>   SMBus (System Management Bus) is based on the I2C protocol, and is mostly
>   a subset of I2C protocols and signaling.  Many I2C devices will work on an
> 


-- 
~Randy