[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWh6bQ1vgzk-kK1Q0rcysXPHtbagBASgcQQ2dVgANG8Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:11:43 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vineet Singh <vineet.singh@...el.com>, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf parse-events: Architecture specific leader override
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 6:47 AM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2021 22:06, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Currently topdown events must appear after a slots event:
> >
> > $ perf stat -e '{slots,topdown-fe-bound}' /bin/true
> >
> > Performance counter stats for '/bin/true':
> >
> > 3,183,090 slots
> > 986,133 topdown-fe-bound
> >
> > Reversing the events yields:
> >
> > $ perf stat -e '{topdown-fe-bound,slots}' /bin/true
> > Error:
> > The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (topdown-fe-bound).
> >
> > For metrics the order of events is determined by iterating over a
> > hashmap, and so slots isn't guaranteed to be first which can yield this
> > error.
> >
> > Change the set_leader in parse-events, called when a group is closed, so
> > that rather than always making the first event the leader, if the slots
> > event exists then it is made the leader. It is then moved to the head of
> > the evlist otherwise it won't be opened in the correct order.
> >
> > The result is:
> >
> > $ perf stat -e '{topdown-fe-bound,slots}' /bin/true
>
> Just curious - does this just affect topdown events? I think x86 is the
> only arch which has them.
The change is specific to x86 as the weak symbol override only happens
on x86. For x86 it only applies if the cpu/slots/ event exists. In the
future it may be used for more than just this - Kajol Jain mentioned a
similar problem for powerpc:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6d1fcb97-223d-7d8e-b5cb-0f10dbc62880@linux.ibm.com/
Thanks,
Ian
> Thanks,
> John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists