linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 15/21] PCI/MSI: Deal with devices lying about their MSI mask capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211119171444.372795407@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:37:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 15/21] PCI/MSI: Deal with devices lying about their MSI mask capability

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>

commit 2226667a145db2e1f314d7f57fd644fe69863ab9 upstream.

It appears that some devices are lying about their mask capability,
pretending that they don't have it, while they actually do.
The net result is that now that we don't enable MSIs on such
endpoint.

Add a new per-device flag to deal with this. Further patches will
make use of it, sadly.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104180130.3825416-2-maz@kernel.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c   |    3 +++
 include/linux/pci.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -592,6 +592,9 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int
 		goto out;
 
 	pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &control);
+	/* Lies, damned lies, and MSIs */
+	if (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_HAS_MSI_MASKING)
+		control |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT;
 
 	entry->msi_attrib.is_msix	= 0;
 	entry->msi_attrib.is_64		= !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT);
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {
 	PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10),
 	/* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */
 	PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 11),
+	/* Device does honor MSI masking despite saying otherwise */
+	PCI_DEV_FLAGS_HAS_MSI_MASKING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 12),
 };
 
 enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {