lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211120045011.3074840-1-almasrymina@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 20:50:06 -0800
From:   Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Deterministic charging of shared memory

Problem:
Currently shared memory is charged to the memcg of the allocating
process. This makes memory usage of processes accessing shared memory
a bit unpredictable since whichever process accesses the memory first
will get charged. We have a number of use cases where our userspace
would like deterministic charging of shared memory:

1. System services allocating memory for client jobs:
We have services (namely a network access service[1]) that provide
functionality for clients running on the machine and allocate memory
to carry out these services. The memory usage of these services
depends on the number of jobs running on the machine and the nature of
the requests made to the service, which makes the memory usage of
these services hard to predict and thus hard to limit via memory.max.
These system services would like a way to allocate memory and instruct
the kernel to charge this memory to the client’s memcg.

2. Shared filesystem between subtasks of a large job
Our infrastructure has large meta jobs such as kubernetes which spawn
multiple subtasks which share a tmpfs mount. These jobs and its
subtasks use that tmpfs mount for various purposes such as data
sharing or persistent data between the subtask restarts. In kubernetes
terminology, the meta job is similar to pods and subtasks are
containers under pods. We want the shared memory to be
deterministically charged to the kubernetes's pod and independent to
the lifetime of containers under the pod.

3. Shared libraries and language runtimes shared between independent jobs.
We’d like to optimize memory usage on the machine by sharing libraries
and language runtimes of many of the processes running on our machines
in separate memcgs. This produces a side effect that one job may be
unlucky to be the first to access many of the libraries and may get
oom killed as all the cached files get charged to it.

Design:
My rough proposal to solve this problem is to simply add a
‘memcg=/path/to/memcg’ mount option for filesystems:
directing all the memory of the file system to be ‘remote charged’ to
cgroup provided by that memcg= option.

Caveats:

1. One complication to address is the behavior when the target memcg
hits its memory.max limit because of remote charging. In this case the
oom-killer will be invoked, but the oom-killer may not find anything
to kill in the target memcg being charged. Thera are a number of considerations
in this case:

1. It's not great to kill the allocating process since the allocating process
   is not running in the memcg under oom, and killing it will not free memory
   in the memcg under oom.
2. Pagefaults may hit the memcg limit, and we need to handle the pagefault
   somehow. If not, the process will forever loop the pagefault in the upstream
   kernel.

In this case, I propose simply failing the remote charge and returning an ENOSPC
to the caller. This will cause will cause the process executing the remote
charge to get an ENOSPC in non-pagefault paths, and get a SIGBUS on the pagefault
path.  This will be documented behavior of remote charging, and this feature is
opt-in. Users can:
- Not opt-into the feature if they want.
- Opt-into the feature and accept the risk of received ENOSPC or SIGBUS and
  abort if they desire.
- Gracefully handle any resulting ENOSPC or SIGBUS errors and continue their
  operation without executing the remote charge if possible.

2. Only processes allowed the enter cgroup at mount time can mount a
tmpfs with memcg=<cgroup>. This is to prevent intential DoS of random cgroups
on the machine. However, once a filesysetem is mounted with memcg=<cgroup>, any
process with write access to this mount point will be able to charge memory to
<cgroup>. This is largely a non-issue because in configurations where there is
untrusted code running on the machine, mount point access needs to be
restricted to the intended users only regardless of whether the mount point
memory is deterministly charged or not.

[1] https://research.google/pubs/pub48630

Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org

Mina Almasry (4):
  mm: support deterministic memory charging of filesystems
  mm/oom: handle remote ooms
  mm, shmem: add filesystem memcg= option documentation
  mm, shmem, selftests: add tmpfs memcg= mount option tests

 Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.rst       |  28 ++++
 fs/fs_context.c                           |  27 ++++
 fs/proc_namespace.c                       |   4 +
 fs/super.c                                |   9 ++
 include/linux/fs.h                        |   5 +
 include/linux/fs_context.h                |   2 +
 include/linux/memcontrol.h                |  38 +++++
 mm/filemap.c                              |   2 +-
 mm/khugepaged.c                           |   3 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c                           | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/oom_kill.c                             |   9 ++
 mm/shmem.c                                |   3 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore     |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/mmap_write.c   | 103 +++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/tmpfs-memcg.sh | 116 +++++++++++++++
 15 files changed, 518 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/mmap_write.c
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vm/tmpfs-memcg.sh

--
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ