[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211120153851.bhxg6xclqagovqiy@linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:38:51 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] locking/rwlocks: introduce write_lock_nested
On 2021-11-19 10:21:37 [-0800], Minchan Kim wrote:
> > #define rt_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) rt_write_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock)))
>
> Guess you meant #define write_lock_nested.
indeed, yes.
> I should have Cced you. Thanks for the catch.
> If it's fine, Andrew, could you fold it?
You are welcome. I tested the series in my RT queue and it works.
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Thank you.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists