[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211119190745.3b706c4b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:07:45 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Yordan Karadzhov <y.karadz@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mingo@...hat.com, hagen@...u.net,
rppt@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vvs@...tuozzo.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
mkoutny@...e.com, Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] namespacefs: Proof-of-Concept
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:22:55 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> But I could write a script or a tool to gather all the information
> without this filesystem. The namespace tree can be reconstructed by
> anything that can view the process tree and the /proc/<pid>/ns
> directory.
So basically you're stating that we could build the same thing that the
namespacefs would give us from inside a privileged container that had
access to the system procfs?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists