[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCDNMCT4KZjw8HnYer9NJBx09yF=KpguGm8Q4vKw8eBr9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:51:24 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>
Cc: balbi@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, khilman@...libre.com,
jbrunet@...libre.com, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] usb: dwc3: meson-g12a: fix shared reset control use
Hi Amjad,
+Cc Anand who was also investigating the original issue one year ago
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:33 PM Amjad Ouled-Ameur
<aouledameur@...libre.com> wrote:
>
>
it seems that there's an extraneous blank line here
> reset_control_(de)assert() calls are called on a shared reset line when
> reset_control_reset has been used. This is not allowed by the reset
> framework.
>
> Use reset_control_rearm() call in suspend() and remove() as a way to state
> that the resource is no longer used, hence the shared reset line
> may be triggered again by other devices. Use reset_control_rearm() also in
> case probe fails after reset() has been called.
>
> reset_control_rearm() keeps use of triggered_count sane in the reset
> framework, use of reset_control_reset() on shared reset line should be
> balanced with reset_control_rearm().
>
> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>
> Reported-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists