lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:08:23 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] iio: buffer-dma: Use round_down() instead of
 rounddown()

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:19:13 +0000
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:

> We know that the buffer's alignment will always be a power of two;
> therefore, we can use the faster round_down() macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
*groan*.  I don't want to know where the naming of these two came from but that
is spectacular... 

Anyhow, happy to pick up 1-3 now if you like as all are good cleanup of
existing code.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> index 1ac94c4e9792..f8ce26a24c57 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int iio_dmaengine_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>  	dma_cookie_t cookie;
>  
>  	block->bytes_used = min(block->size, dmaengine_buffer->max_size);
> -	block->bytes_used = rounddown(block->bytes_used,
> +	block->bytes_used = round_down(block->bytes_used,
>  			dmaengine_buffer->align);
>  
>  	desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dmaengine_buffer->chan,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ