[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4mq1H9N4BEAT2zoPxa85SXN2jPHqEJA7HCgavaDDpfEDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:02:19 +0200
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: samsung: Remove HAVE_S3C2410_I2C and use direct dependencies
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 at 14:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2021 14:49, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > A separate Kconfig option HAVE_S3C2410_I2C for Samsung SoCs is not
> > really needed and the i2c-s3c24xx driver can depend on Samsung ARM
> > architectures instead. This also enables i2c-s3c2410 for arm64 Exynos
> > SoCs, which is required for example by Exynos850.
> >
> > This is basically continuation of work made in following commits:
> > - commit d96890fca9fd ("rtc: s3c: remove HAVE_S3C_RTC in favor of
> > direct dependencies")
> > - commit 7dd3cae90d85 ("ARM: samsung: remove HAVE_S3C2410_WATCHDOG and
> > use direct dependencies")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 -
> > arch/arm/mach-s3c/Kconfig.s3c64xx | 1 -
> > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 1 -
> > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 10 ++--------
> > 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
>
> This does not apply, which is weird because there were no changes here.
> It seems you based your work on some older tree, so please rebase and
> re-test on current tree (my for-next branch or linux-next).
>
This is strange indeed, those two patches are rebased flawlessly on
linux-next for me. Anyway, I'll send v2 today, thanks for letting me
know.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists