linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] riscv: dts: sifive unmatched: Expose the board ID eeprom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a6111407-c0a4-0c35-dc26-f30022df775b@canonical.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Nov 2021 18:23:37 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...inos.com.cn>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] riscv: dts: sifive unmatched: Expose the board ID
 eeprom

On 19/11/2021 23:55, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Mark it as read-only as it is factory-programmed with identifying
> information, and no executable nor configuration:
> - eth MAC address
> - board model (PCB version, BoM version)
> - board serial number
> Accidental modification would cause misidentification which could brick
> the board, so marking read-only seem like both a safe and non-constraining
> choice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Fix end-of-commit-message separator so change lists do not end up in them.
> Changes since v1:
> - Remove trailing "." on subject line.
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>


Best regards,
Krzysztof