linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 07/10] io_uring: switch to kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:17:11 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        vverma@...italocean.com, hdanton@...a.com, hch@...radead.org,
        stefanha@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
        sgarzare@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        christian.brauner@...ntu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 07/10] io_uring: switch to kernel_worker

On 11/21/21 10:49 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
> Convert io_uring and io-wq to use kernel_worker.

I don't like the kernel_worker name, that implies it's always giving you
a kernel thread or kthread. That's not the io_uring use case, it's
really just a thread off the original task that just happens to never
exit to userspace.

Can we do a better name? At least io_thread doesn't imply that.

Also I do think this deserves a bit more commit message, there's really
nothing in here.

-- 
Jens Axboe