[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB7081CC991251D8F9D3B8F301E79E9@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 23:47:27 +0000
From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
"heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com"
<heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>,
"bin.meng@...driver.com" <bin.meng@...driver.com>,
"sagar.kadam@...ive.com" <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] RISC-V: Clean up the defconfigs
On 2021/11/20 1:45, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> It's been a while since updating the defconfigs, so I figured it would
> be good to go through all the diff to make sure nothing was lurking. It
> turns out there were two minor issues, which I've fixed with the first
> two patches. The rest of these are just cleanups that should have no
> functional change.
>
> I don't have a K210 (I might somewhere, but I've yet to boot it) so I
> can't test this to make sure, but I think patch 2 is the reason we have
> a special !MMU PAGE_OFFSET config. If someone does have one it'd be
> nice to be able to remove that special case.
Note: incorrect email address for Atish. Fixed here.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists