linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control over SPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYpy0x0Eek2ir3Dc8-DF7LteESKuo9etWZzdUdDdbxLnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:59:42 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control
 over SPI

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:14 AM Colin Foster
<colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:58:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: combine get resource and ioremap into single call
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: expose ocelot_pinctrl_core_probe interface
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: update to support regmap
> > >   device property: add helper function fwnode_get_child_node_count
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: change device tree matches to use nodes
> > >     instead of device
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: expose microchip_sgpio_core_probe interface
> >
> > Can these patches be broken out to its own series and handled
> > separately from the DSA stuff or is there build-time dependencies?
>
> These should all be able to be a separate series if I did my job right.
> Everything should have no functional change except for this:
>
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address
>
> Fortunately this was tested by Clément and didn't seem to have any
> ill-fated side effects.
>
> I assume this isn't something I wouldn't want to submit to net-next...
> is there a different place (tree? board? list?) where those should be
> submitted?

To the pinctrl maintainer i.e. me + linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
then I can just apply them if there are no more review comments.

Yours,
Linus Walleij