[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1b8o9hb.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:55:28 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/20] linux/power_of_2.h: Add __IS_POWER_OF_2(n) and
__IS_POWER_OF_2_OR_0(n) macros
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 2:01 PM Alejandro Colomar
> <alx.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>> +
>> +#define __IS_POWER_OF_2_OR_0(n) (((n) & ((n) - 1)) == 0)
>> +#define __IS_POWER_OF_2(n) (__IS_POWER_OF_2_OR_0(n) && ((n) != 0))
>> +
>
> There is already is_power_of_2() in include/linux/log2.h, which would
> be preferred
> in most cases. If you need a macro version, put it in the same file
> and explain why it's
> needed.
Also, the macro argument n is evaluated 2-3 times. Please use
checkpatch.pl --strict argument on the patches, and it'll give you hints
about this stuff too.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists