[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o86co8u6.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:09:21 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yong yiran <yong.yiran@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] drm/i915/request: Remove unused variables
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 21/11/2021 à 11:13, cgel.zte@...il.com a écrit :
>> From: yong yiran <yong.yiran@....com.cn>
>>
>> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c:2119:2 warning:
>> Value stored to 'x' is never read
>>
>> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: yong yiran <yong.yiran@....com.cn>
The sender's Signed-off-by is missing.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> index 820a1f38b271..5e4420f461e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> @@ -2047,7 +2047,6 @@ void i915_request_show(struct drm_printer *m,
>> {
>> const char *name = rq->fence.ops->get_timeline_name((struct dma_fence *)&rq->fence);
>> char buf[80] = "";
>> - int x = 0;
>>
>> /*
>> * The prefix is used to show the queue status, for which we use
>> @@ -2079,8 +2078,6 @@ void i915_request_show(struct drm_printer *m,
>> * from the lists
>> */
>>
>> - x = print_sched_attr(&rq->sched.attr, buf, x, sizeof(buf));
>> -
>
> Seriously?
Basically I've started considering all of these patches as static
analyzer reports *only*. The "fixes" have often been completely wrong or
have missed the real issue and merely silenced the warning.
I really couldn't say anything about the "Zeal Robot" itself, but the
patches are giving it a bad reputation.
BR,
Jani.
>
> CJ
>
>
>> drm_printf(m, "%s%.*s%c %llx:%lld%s%s %s @ %dms: %s\n",
>> prefix, indent, " ",
>> queue_status(rq),
>>
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists