[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZt+x2moR632x///@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:28:07 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bitops: Add single_bit_set()
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:03:25PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> There are cases when it is useful to check a bit-mask has only one bit
> set. Add a generic helper for it instead of baking own one for each
> user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> ---
> I am not at all sure what would be the best place for this. Please let
> me know if you think some other file would be more appropriate.
So, you decided to reinvent hamming weight...
Please, drop this patch and use corresponding hweight() call.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists