[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2111221239050.205511@gentwo.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:40:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc: Rustam Kovhaev <rkovhaev@...il.com>, penberg@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, djwong@...nel.org,
david@...morbit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
dvyukov@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] slob: add size header to all allocations
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> It's no problem to have the real beginning of the object aligned, and the
> prepended header not. The code already does that before this patch for the
> kmalloc power-of-two alignments, where e.g. the object can be aligned to 256
> bytes, but the prepended header to a smaller ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN /
> ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN.
Ok but then the first object in a page may still have those issues.
> > I dont know but it seems that making slob that sophisticated is counter
> > productive. Remove SLOB?
>
> I wouldn't mind, but somebody might :)
Well run a space efficiency analysis after this patch. If the memory used
is larger than SLUB (with the configuration for minimal data footprint)
then there is no reason for SLOB to continue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists