[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZuqJiZznMfqmWR7@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:33:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com,
bkylerussell@...il.com, festevam@...il.com,
kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
nicoleotsuka@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, shengjiu.wang@...il.com,
tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 2/5] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: Add support for pll_r
coefficient
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:24:42PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:22 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:32:45PM -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:
> > > When the clock used by the codec is BCLK, the operation parameters need
> > > to be calculated from input sample rate and format. Low frequency rates
> > > required different r multipliers, in order to achieve a higher PLL
> > > output frequency.
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>
> > Did Michael write this code (in which case there should be a From: from
> > him) or did he work on the code with you? The signoffs are a little
> > confusing.
> It's fine. We are working together
In such situations it's best to include a Co-developed-by tag to say
what's going on, that makes it clear what's going on.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists