[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ba2c0c40b3abeecdef0eacb46d957aaa2fd24bf.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 06:51:37 -0800
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon
driver
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 07:21 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:18:25AM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > > These sysfs attributes are crazy. Who has audited them to be correct
> > > and work properly? It feels like there are just buffer overflows
> > > waiting to be exploited in them due to the reading/writing of raw memory
> > > buffers all over the place.
> >
> > Agree with the concern. I can submit the tests that were used. Is selftests
> > the
> > best place?
>
> Yes.
>
> > > Where is the userspace tool that uses these files?
> >
> > The tool will be published in the same github repo as the spec once the
> > driver
> > is ready.
>
> Isn't the driver "ready" if you are asking for it to be accepted
> here? Why isn't it published already so we can see if it actually is
> tested?
It will be required for the tests anyway, so I'll submit it with them.
Thanks.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists