linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] vhost_net: use RCU callbacks instead of synchronize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ba4dbc25-f912-fb34-a0e2-c6c85b34b918@yandex-team.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:12:59 +0300
From:   Andrey Ryabinin <arbn@...dex-team.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] vhost_net: use RCU callbacks instead of
 synchronize_rcu()



On 11/22/21 12:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:32:05PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/21 8:00 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:32 PM Andrey Ryabinin <arbn@...dex-team.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Currently vhost_net_release() uses synchronize_rcu() to synchronize
>>>> freeing with vhost_zerocopy_callback(). However synchronize_rcu()
>>>> is quite costly operation. It take more than 10 seconds
>>>> to shutdown qemu launched with couple net devices like this:
>>>>         -netdev tap,id=tap0,..,vhost=on,queues=80
>>>> because we end up calling synchronize_rcu() netdev_count*queues times.
>>>>
>>>> Free vhost net structures in rcu callback instead of using
>>>> synchronize_rcu() to fix the problem.
>>>
>>> I admit the release code is somehow hard to understand. But I wonder
>>> if the following case can still happen with this:
>>>
>>> CPU 0 (vhost_dev_cleanup)   CPU1
>>> (vhost_net_zerocopy_callback()->vhost_work_queue())
>>>                                                 if (!dev->worker)
>>> dev->worker = NULL
>>>
>>> wake_up_process(dev->worker)
>>>
>>> If this is true. It seems the fix is to move RCU synchronization stuff
>>> in vhost_net_ubuf_put_and_wait()?
>>>
>>
>> It all depends whether vhost_zerocopy_callback() can be called outside of vhost
>> thread context or not. If it can run after vhost thread stopped, than the race you
>> describe seems possible and the fix in commit b0c057ca7e83 ("vhost: fix a theoretical race in device cleanup")
>> wasn't complete. I would fix it by calling synchronize_rcu() after vhost_net_flush()
>> and before vhost_dev_cleanup().
>>
>> As for the performance problem, it can be solved by replacing synchronize_rcu() with synchronize_rcu_expedited().
> 
> expedited causes a stop of IPIs though, so it's problematic to
> do it upon a userspace syscall.
> 

How about something like this?


---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 97a209d6a527..556df26c584d 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ struct vhost_net {
 	struct page_frag page_frag;
 	/* Refcount bias of page frag */
 	int refcnt_bias;
+
+	struct socket *tx_sock;
+	struct socket *rx_sock;
+	struct rcu_work rwork;
 };
 
 static unsigned vhost_net_zcopy_mask __read_mostly;
@@ -1389,6 +1393,24 @@ static void vhost_net_flush(struct vhost_net *n)
 	}
 }
 
+static void vhost_net_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct vhost_net *n =
+		container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct vhost_net, rwork);
+	vhost_dev_cleanup(&n->dev);
+	vhost_net_vq_reset(n);
+	if (n->tx_sock)
+		sockfd_put(n->tx_sock);
+	if (n->rx_sock)
+		sockfd_put(n->rx_sock);
+	kfree(n->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX].rxq.queue);
+	kfree(n->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX].xdp);
+	kfree(n->dev.vqs);
+	if (n->page_frag.page)
+		__page_frag_cache_drain(n->page_frag.page, n->refcnt_bias);
+	kvfree(n);
+}
+
 static int vhost_net_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
 {
 	struct vhost_net *n = f->private_data;
@@ -1398,21 +1420,11 @@ static int vhost_net_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
 	vhost_net_stop(n, &tx_sock, &rx_sock);
 	vhost_net_flush(n);
 	vhost_dev_stop(&n->dev);
-	vhost_dev_cleanup(&n->dev);
-	vhost_net_vq_reset(n);
-	if (tx_sock)
-		sockfd_put(tx_sock);
-	if (rx_sock)
-		sockfd_put(rx_sock);
-	/* Make sure no callbacks are outstanding */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	n->tx_sock = tx_sock;
+	n->rx_sock = rx_sock;
 
-	kfree(n->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX].rxq.queue);
-	kfree(n->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX].xdp);
-	kfree(n->dev.vqs);
-	if (n->page_frag.page)
-		__page_frag_cache_drain(n->page_frag.page, n->refcnt_bias);
-	kvfree(n);
+	INIT_RCU_WORK(&n->rwork, vhost_net_cleanup);
+	queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &n->rwork);
 	return 0;
 }
 
--