[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZsDQBzfuW51LT+t@hr-amd>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:41:04 +0800
From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
To: Juuso Alasuutari <juuso.alasuutari@...il.com>,
"Fontenot, Nathan" <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>
Cc: "Su, Jinzhou (Joe)" <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
"Sharma, Deepak" <Deepak.Sharma@....com>,
"ggherdovich@...e.cz" <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"skhan@...uxfoundation.org" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"steven@...vesoftware.com" <steven@...vesoftware.com>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/22] cpupower: add the function to get the sysfs
value from specific table
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 06:19:43AM +0800, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:38:58 -0600, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> > On 11/19/21 4:30 AM, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > Expose the helper into cpufreq header, then cpufreq driver can use this
> > > function to get the sysfs value if it has any specific sysfs interfaces.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > > tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.c b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.c
> > > index c3b56db8b921..02719cc400a1 100644
> > > --- a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.c
> > > +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.c
> > > @@ -83,20 +83,21 @@ static const char *cpufreq_value_files[MAX_CPUFREQ_VALUE_READ_FILES] = {
> > > [STATS_NUM_TRANSITIONS] = "stats/total_trans"
> > > };
> > >
> > > -
> > > -static unsigned long sysfs_cpufreq_get_one_value(unsigned int cpu,
> > > - enum cpufreq_value which)
> > > +unsigned long cpufreq_get_sysfs_value_from_table(unsigned int cpu,
> > > + const char **table,
> > > + unsigned index,
> > > + unsigned size)
> > > {
> > > unsigned long value;
> > > unsigned int len;
> > > char linebuf[MAX_LINE_LEN];
> > > char *endp;
> > >
> > > - if (which >= MAX_CPUFREQ_VALUE_READ_FILES)
> > > + if (!table && !table[index] && index >= size)
> >
> > Should you validate the index before accessing table[index]
> >
> > if (!table && index >= size && !table[index])
>
> The operator is wrong as well. I believe this is what was originally intended:
>
> if (!table || index >= size || !table[index])
Yes, nice catch. Thanks. Updated it.
Thanks,
Ray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists