[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211122175903.GA28130@jannau.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:59:03 +0100
From: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
To: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: i2c: apple,i2c: allow multiple
compatibles
On 2021-11-21 21:22:47 +0100, Sven Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021, at 18:15, Janne Grunau wrote:
> > The intention was to have a SoC-specific and base compatible string
> > to allow forward compatibility and SoC specific quirks,
> >
> > Fixes: df7c4a8c1b47 ("dt-bindings: i2c: Add Apple I2C controller bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
> > Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>
> > ---
>
> Yeah, this should've been "apple,t8103-i2c", "apple,i2c" all along :/
> Given that we have no i2c nodes in the dts yet and that this binding was
> only added for -rc1 I think it's fine to just drop "apple,t8103-i2c"
> here instead of marking it as deprecated and keeping it around forever
> if Mark Kettenis also agrees.
>
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > index 22fc8483256f..f1cb96c08212 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > @@ -20,9 +20,10 @@ allOf:
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > - enum:
> > - - apple,t8103-i2c
> > - - apple,i2c
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - apple,t8103-i2c
> > + - const: apple,i2c
>
> Nit: the enum makes sense once we add t6000-i2c but right now
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> items:
> - const: apple,t8103-i2c
> - const: apple,i2c
>
> also works and look a bit less weird.
I split it from change which in addition added "apple,t6000-i2c" as
second enum value. I have no strong preference but the weirdness will
hopefully vanish soon.
Janne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists