linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] selftests: sev_migrate_tests: add tests for KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:52:08 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] selftests: sev_migrate_tests: add tests for
 KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021, Peter Gonda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 9:38 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> > +static void test_sev_mirror(bool es)
> > +{
> > +       struct kvm_vm *src_vm, *dst_vm;
> > +       struct kvm_sev_launch_start start = {
> > +               .policy = es ? SEV_POLICY_ES : 0
> > +       };
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       src_vm = sev_vm_create(es);
> > +       dst_vm = aux_vm_create(false);
> > +
> > +       sev_mirror_create(dst_vm->fd, src_vm->fd);
> > +
> > +       /* Check that we can complete creation of the mirror VM.  */
> > +       for (i = 0; i < NR_MIGRATE_TEST_VCPUS; ++i)
> > +               vm_vcpu_add(dst_vm, i);
> 
> Style question. I realized I didn't do this myself but should there
> always be blank line after these conditionals/loops without {}s? Tom
> had me add them to work in ccp driver, unsure if that should be
> maintained everywhere.

Generally speaking, yes.  There will inevitably be exceptions where it's ok to
omit a blank line, e.g. kvm_ioapic_clear_all() is a decent example, as is
kvm_update_dr0123().  But for something like this where the for-loop is a different
"block" than the following code, a blank line is preferred.