[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211123123852.11a84a9e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:38:52 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Aili Yao <yaoaili126@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yaoaili@...gsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/isolation: delete redundant
housekeeping_overridden check
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:45:35 +0800
Aili Yao <yaoaili126@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Aili Yao <yaoaili@...gsoft.com>
>
> housekeeping_test_cpu is only called by housekeeping_cpu(),
> and in housekeeping_cpu(), there is already one same check;
>
> So delete the redundant check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aili Yao <yaoaili@...gsoft.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/isolation.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 7f06eaf..5c4d533 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -56,9 +56,8 @@ void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t, enum
> hk_flags flags)
> bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_flags flags)
> {
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
> - if (housekeeping_flags & flags)
> - return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu,
> housekeeping_mask);
Not only is your email client broken, you don't seem to understand what
static_branch_unlikely() is.
NACK.
-- Steve
> + if (housekeeping_flags & flags)
> + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_mask);
> return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_test_cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists