[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b6e9af20d5e18315986c8e004a13c3840afb9ad.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:59:58 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2243:3: warning: unannotated fall-through
between switch labels
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 11:56 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 10:50 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:52:30AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps this would be better:
> > >
> > > Feel free to send a proper patch.
> >
> > I commented on your proposed patch.
>
> And I reply giving you an option if you want to proceed.
>
> > And I'd prefer you actually look at and improve the code instead
> > of merely silencing warnings.
>
> If this is a matter of preference then I should express my preferences, too.
> So, I prefer to give you the opportunity of improving the code and not being
> pedantic at the same time. :)
It appears to be difficult to give you suggestions on how to improve
what you do.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists