linux-kernel - Re: arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2243:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:59:58 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2243:3: warning: unannotated fall-through
 between switch labels

On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 11:56 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 10:50 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:52:30AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps this would be better:
> > > 
> > > Feel free to send a proper patch.
> > 
> > I commented on your proposed patch.
> 
> And I reply giving you an option if you want to proceed.
> 
> > And I'd prefer you actually look at and improve the code instead
> > of merely silencing warnings.
> 
> If this is a matter of preference then I should express my preferences, too.
> So, I prefer to give you the opportunity of improving the code and not being
> pedantic at the same time. :)

It appears to be difficult to give you suggestions on how to improve
what you do.

cheers, Joe