[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ03W6UeSGxkn+Au@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:47:55 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:45:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:49:02PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > + # Check if we could parse something and the channel number fits
>
> > + [ "$chan" != "$elem" ] && [ "$chan" -le $max_chans ] || fail "Trigger syntax error: $elem"
>
> No need to execute `test` twice:
>
> [ "$chan" != "$elem" -a "$chan" -le $max_chans ] || fail "Trigger syntax error: $elem"
On the second thought this might be a different logic...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists