[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ05/73+BhIANNGF@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:59:11 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
jacmet@...site.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: uartlite: allow 64 bit address
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:45:06AM -0800, Lizhi Hou wrote:
> Fix the uartlite probe failure when it is mapped to address above 4G.
Fix it how?
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
What commit caused this problem? What commit does this fix? Should it
go to stable kernels?
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> index d3d9566e5dbd..e1fa52d31474 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static struct uart_driver ulite_uart_driver = {
> *
> * Returns: 0 on success, <0 otherwise
> */
> -static int ulite_assign(struct device *dev, int id, u32 base, int irq,
> +static int ulite_assign(struct device *dev, int id, phys_addr_t base, int irq,
> struct uartlite_data *pdata)
So you changed the variable type which does what exactly here?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists