[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZxqLi7/JDN9mQoK@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:12:30 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] modpost: file2alias: fixup mdio alias garbled
code in modules.alias
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:33:03AM +0800, zhuyinbo wrote:
>
> 在 2021/11/22 下午10:07, Andrew Lunn 写道:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 08:14:57PM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>
> After module compilation, module alias mechanism will generate a ugly
> mdio modules alias configure if ethernet phy was selected, this patch
> is to fixup mdio alias garbled code.
>
> In addition, that ugly alias configure will cause ethernet phy module
> doens't match udev, phy module auto-load is fail, but add this patch
> that it is well mdio driver alias configure match phy device uevent.
>
> What PHY do you have problems with? What is the PHY id and which
> driver should be loaded.
>
> This code has existed a long time, so suddenly saying it is wrong and
> changing it needs a good explanation why it is wrong. Being ugly is
> not a good reason.
>
> Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Use default mdio configure, After module compilation, mdio alias configure
> is following and it doesn't match
>
> the match phy dev(mdio dev) uevent, because the mdio alias configure
> "0000000101000001000011111001????" include "?" and
A PHY ID generally break up into 3 parts.
The OUI of the manufacture.
The device.
The revision
The ? means these bits don't matter. Those correspond to the
revision. Generally, a driver can driver any revision of the PHY,
which is why those bits don't matter.
So when a driver probes with the id 00000001010000010000111110010110
we expect user space to find the best match, performing wildcard
expansion. So the ? will match anything.
Since this is worked for a long time, do you have an example where it
is broken? If so, which PHY driver? If it is broken, no driver is
loaded, or the wrong driver is loaded, i expect it is a bug in a
specific driver. And we should fix that bug in the specific driver.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists