[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWKHoBWm2XQmKwB0q8Ya8KzpCgA29D0igXJrGY8=3e8_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:20:23 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Non-const bitfield helper conversions
Hi Alexandre,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 6:50 PM Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On 22/11/2021 16:53:53+0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The existing FIELD_{GET,PREP}() macros are limited to compile-time
> > constants. However, it is very common to prepare or extract bitfield
> > elements where the bitfield mask is not a compile-time constant.
> > To avoid this limitation, the AT91 clock driver already has its own
> > field_{prep,get}() macros.
>
> My understanding was that this (being compile time only) was actually
> done on purpose. Did I misunderstand?
Yes, it was done on purpose, to maximize type safety.
However, this imposes a severe limitation: we cannot use them in case
the mask is non-const (i.e. stored in some data structure). This
is a quite common use-case, given the examples I found and converted,
and given you added field_{get,prep}() to the AT91 clock driver.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists