[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211123083636.5603-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:36:36 +0000
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, amit@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, corbet@....net, david@...hat.com,
dwmw@...zon.com, elver@...gle.com, foersleo@...zon.de,
gthelen@...gle.com, markubo@...zon.de, rientjes@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, linux-damon@...zon.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Introduce DAMON-based Proactive Reclamation
Hello Oleksandr,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 23:32:12 +0100 Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On úterý 19. října 2021 17:07:16 CET SeongJae Park wrote:
> > In short, DAMON_RECLAIM with 50ms/s time quota and regions prioritization on
> > v5.15-rc5 Linux kernel with ZRAM swap device achieves 38.58% memory saving
> > with only 1.94% runtime overhead. For this, DAMON_RECLAIM consumes only
> > 4.97% of single CPU time.
>
> While it really consumes little CPU time, is it fine for `kdamond.0` to be in a
> D (uninterruptible sleep) state all the time while active, pushing loadavg
> over 1.0?
Good point, this could confuse some users using loadavg. I will send a fix for
this soon.
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists