[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZywV4lRV7g4Bj87@unreal>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:11:51 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc] RDMA/cma: Remove open coding for overflow in
cma_connect_ib
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:48:53PM +0100, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> The existing test is a little hard to comprehend. Use
> check_add_overflow() instead.
>
> Fixes: 04ded1672402 ("RDMA/cma: Verify private data length")
> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> index 835ac54..0435768 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> @@ -4093,8 +4093,7 @@ static int cma_connect_ib(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
>
> memset(&req, 0, sizeof req);
> offset = cma_user_data_offset(id_priv);
> - req.private_data_len = offset + conn_param->private_data_len;
> - if (req.private_data_len < conn_param->private_data_len)
> + if (check_add_overflow(offset, conn_param->private_data_len, &req.private_data_len))
> return -EINVAL;
The same check exists in cma_resolve_ib_udp too.
Thanks
>
> if (req.private_data_len) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists