[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211123121136.GD56473@e120937-lin>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:11:36 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com>,
Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic mode support to
virtio transport
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:06:38PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add support for .mark_txdone and .poll_done transport operations to SCMI
> VirtIO transport as pre-requisites to enable atomic operations.
>
> Add a Kernel configuration option to enable SCMI VirtIO transport polling
> and atomic mode for selected SCMI transactions while leaving it default
> disabled.
>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Cc: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com>
> Cc: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>
> Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Hi,
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 15 ++
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c | 212 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
> index d429326433d1..7794bd41eaa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
> @@ -118,6 +118,21 @@ config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_VIRTIO_VERSION1_COMPLIANCE
> the ones implemented by kvmtool) and let the core Kernel VirtIO layer
> take care of the needed conversions, say N.
>
> +config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_VIRTIO_ATOMIC_ENABLE
> + bool "Enable atomic mode for SCMI VirtIO transport"
> + depends on ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_VIRTIO
> + help
> + Enable support of atomic operation for SCMI VirtIO based transport.
> +
> + If you want the SCMI VirtIO based transport to operate in atomic
> + mode, avoiding any kind of sleeping behaviour for selected
> + transactions on the TX path, answer Y.
> +
> + Enabling atomic mode operations allows any SCMI driver using this
> + transport to optionally ask for atomic SCMI transactions and operate
> + in atomic context too, at the price of using a number of busy-waiting
> + primitives all over instead. If unsure say N.
> +
> endif #ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL
>
[snip]
> static void scmi_vio_complete_cb(struct virtqueue *vqueue)
> @@ -138,12 +157,29 @@ static void scmi_vio_complete_cb(struct virtqueue *vqueue)
> goto unlock_ready_out;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_VIRTIO_ATOMIC_ENABLE
> + /* At first loop on pending_cmd_list of buffered msg if any */
> + if (!vioch->is_rx) {
> + struct scmi_vio_msg *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, tmp,
> + &vioch->pending_cmds_list,
> + list) {
> + scmi_rx_callback(vioch->cinfo,
> + msg_read_header(msg->input),
> + msg);
> + scmi_vio_feed_vq_tx(vioch, msg);
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> +
doing further testing I spotted a trivial bug on the limit condition
where polling and non-polling requests are interleaved on the cmd
vqueue. (hard to reproduce ... but it's there and it's broken)
This one-liner fixes the issue with the above snippet:
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c
index 3101024751b0..cf247093ef48 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static void scmi_vio_complete_cb(struct virtqueue *vqueue)
scmi_rx_callback(vioch->cinfo,
msg_read_header(msg->input),
msg);
+ list_del(&msg->list);
scmi_vio_feed_vq_tx(vioch, msg);
}
}
It seems there will be a V7 ...
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists