[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d1da34f-7b47-3d19-40ce-98b62d6e6f6d@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:09:42 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pipe: fix potential use-after-free in pipe_read()
On 2021/11/15 21:05, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:13:44PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/11/15 12:25, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:57:20AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>>> if (!buf->len) {
>>>> + unsigned int __maybe_unused flags = buf->flags;
>>>
>>> Why __maybe_unused?
>>
>> It's used only if "#ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE". Otherwise, a warning will be reported.
>
> Better to turn the #ifdef into if (IS_ENABLED())
Hi, Matthew:
Thank you for your advice. IS_ENABLED() is a good idea, but when I tried it, I found that
the macro 'PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LOSS' and the structure member 'note_loss' were also separated by
"ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE", so this method is not suitable here.
#ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
#define PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LOSS 0x40 /* Message loss happened after this buffer */
#endif
@@ -62,9 +60,7 @@ struct pipe_inode_info {
unsigned int tail;
unsigned int max_usage;
unsigned int ring_size;
#ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
bool note_loss;
#endif
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists