[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e15c57b9-f52d-0ca9-ae77-f01fb8c8eab7@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:39:45 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Some gaccess cleanup
On 10/28/21 15:55, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Cleanup s390 guest access code a bit, getting rid of some code
> duplication and improving readability.
>
> v1 -> v2
> separate patch for renamed variable
> fragment_len instead of seg
> expand comment of guest_range_to_gpas
> fix nits
>
> I did not pick up Janosch's Reviewed-by because of the split patch
> and the changed variable name.
>
> Janis Schoetterl-Glausch (3):
> KVM: s390: gaccess: Refactor gpa and length calculation
> KVM: s390: gaccess: Refactor access address range check
> KVM: s390: gaccess: Cleanup access to guest frames
>
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
Could you please push this to devel so we get some CI coverage?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists