[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211123145006.bon3usz4ilhw6ymg@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:50:06 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'__raw_write_lock_nested'
On 2021-11-23 15:48:34 [+0100], Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Except for:
>
> kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of
> function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean
> '_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 306 | __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | _raw_write_lock_nested
>
> Which was also reported for other architectures:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202111201111.c2ApGeHR-lkp@intel.com/
I'm on it. Almost done.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists