linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] spi: deduplicate spi_match_id() in __spi_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163762562904.2472045.10269153902428824704.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:29 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] spi: deduplicate spi_match_id() in __spi_register_driver()

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:37:17 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The same logic is used in spi_match_id() and in the __spi_register_driver().
> By switching the former from taking struct spi_device * to const char * as
> the second parameter we may deduplicate the code.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: deduplicate spi_match_id() in __spi_register_driver()
      commit: 3f07657506df363709a37f99db04e9e0d0b1bce7
[2/2] spi: Fix multi-line comment style
      (no commit info)

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark