[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <756f813c-cc3e-7ddf-e5db-cf6c874f907e@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:11:02 +0000
From: Lucas tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Kailang Yang <kailang@...ltek.com>,
Shuming Fan <shumingf@...ltek.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
Vitaly Rodionov <vitalyr@...nsource.cirrus.com>
CC: Jeremy Szu <jeremy.szu@...onical.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>,
Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>,
Cameron Berkenpas <cam@...-zeon.de>,
Sami Loone <sami@...ne.fi>, Elia Devito <eliadevito@...il.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Jack Yu <jack.yu@...ltek.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100
ACPI nodes
On 11/23/21 17:05, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On 11/23/21 17:31, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with multiple
>> instances of CS35L41.
>>
>> We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate
>> all I2C slaves correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
>> drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> index 2c80765670bc..16827a33e93b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
>> {"BSG2150", },
>> {"INT33FE", },
>> {"INT3515", },
>> + {"CLSA0100", },
>> {}
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> index 4956a1df5b90..ed25a0adc656 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[] = {
>> {}
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct i2c_inst_data clsa0100_data[] = {
>> + { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>> + { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>
> This suggests that both amplifiers are using the same GPIO pin as shared
> IRQ, is that correct ? Can you share an acpidump of the laptop's DSDT tables ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
DSDT attached.
Yes, both amps share the same IRQ gpio.
>
>
>
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
>> * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
>> @@ -155,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
>> { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
>> { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
>> { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
>> + { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)clsa0100_data },
>> { }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
>>
>
View attachment "dsdt.dsl" of type "text/x-dsl" (1156776 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists