[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211124122055.64424-5-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:20:46 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: X86: Use vcpu->arch.walk_mmu for kvm_mmu_invlpg()
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
In design, the guest virtuall address is only make sense for
vcpu->arch.walk_mmu which is often the same as vcpu->arch.mmu. But
they are different semantic by design, so vcpu->arch.walk_mmu should be
used instead like other call site of kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva().
In theory, if L2's invlpg is being emulated by L0 (in practice, it
hardly happen) when nTDP is used, ->tlb_flush_gva() should be called
to flush hwTLB, but using vcpu->arch.mmu causes it incorrectly skept.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f3aa91db4a7e..72ce0d78435e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5353,7 +5353,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
void kvm_mmu_invlpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
{
- kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmu, gva, INVALID_PAGE);
+ kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(vcpu, vcpu->arch.walk_mmu, gva, INVALID_PAGE);
++vcpu->stat.invlpg;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_invlpg);
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists