[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZ5RDnDNIsWz+TC2@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:49:50 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpiolib: check the 'ngpios' property in core
gpiolib code
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:46:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:28:50PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > Several drivers read the 'ngpios' device property on their own, but
> > since it's defined as a standard GPIO property in the device tree bindings
> > anyway, it's a good candidate for generalization. If the driver didn't
> > set its gc->ngpio, try to read the 'ngpios' property from the GPIO
> > device's firmware node before bailing out.
...
> What about the modified suggestion from previous version:
>
> if (gc->ngpio == 0) {
> ret = device_property_read_u32(&gdev->dev, "ngpios", &ngpios);
> /*
> * -ENODATA means that there is no property found and
> * we want to issue the error message to the user. Besides
> * that, we want to return different error code to state
> * that supplied value is not valid.
> */
> if (ret == -ENODATA)
> ngpios = 0;
> else if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> gc->ngpio = ngpios;
> }
>
> if (gc->ngpio == 0) {
> chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto err_free_descs;
> }
>
> ?
If you okay to go with this code,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists