linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/154] 5.10.82-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14fbe436-7bd0-5310-6e06-1c3b006b7916@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:27:43 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/154] 5.10.82-rc1 review

24.11.2021 18:16, Naresh Kamboju пишет:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 18:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.82 release.
>> There are 154 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:56:36 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.82-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> Regression found on arm gcc-11 builds
> As I have already reported,
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYskrxZvmrjhO32Q9r7mb1AtKdLBm4OvDNvt5v4PTgm4pA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c: In function 'tegra_cpuidle_probe':
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c:349:38: error:
> 'TEGRA_SUSPEND_NOT_READY' undeclared (first use in this function); did
> you mean 'TEGRA_SUSPEND_NONE'?
>   349 |  if (tegra_pmc_get_suspend_mode() == TEGRA_SUSPEND_NOT_READY)
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      TEGRA_SUSPEND_NONE
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Due to the following patch,
> 
> cpuidle: tegra: Check whether PMC is ready
> [ Upstream commit bdb1ffdad3b73e4d0538098fc02e2ea87a6b27cd ]

Hi Greg and all,

Greg, could you please drop this patch from the stable trees? It
shouldn't be backported since the actual offending patch which causes
the "fixed" problem is still pending to be merged. I assumed that all
patches would be merged much earlier when was typing the commit message,
but only a part of patches were merged yet. Sorry for noticing this so late.