[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGxU2F622pzZkh8WC7J+jGYu-_ozSDx1Tvvvtw-z52xwC3S38A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:39:16 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Michael Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>,
Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] vDPA/ifcvf: enables Intel C5000X-PL virtio-blk
Hi Zhu,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:39 AM Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> This series enabled Intel FGPA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-blk for vDPA.
Looking at the IFCVF upstream vDPA driver (with this series applied), it
seems that there is still some cleaning to be done to support virtio-blk
devices:
- ifcvf_vdpa_get_config() and ifcvf_vdpa_set_config() use
`sizeof(struct virtio_net_config)` to check the inputs.
This seems wrong for a virtio-blk device. Maybe we can set the config
size for each device in ifcvf_vdpa_dev_add() and use that field to
check the inputs. We can reuse the same field also in
ifcvf_vdpa_get_config_size().
- Just for make the code more readable we should rename `net_cfg` field
to `device_cfg`in `struct ifcvf_hw`.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists