linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/100] 5.4.162-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:10:35 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/100] 5.4.162-rc1 review

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 18:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.162 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:56:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.162-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Regression found on arm64 gcc-11 builds
Following build warnings / errors reported on stable-rc 5.4.


builds/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtsi:412.21-414.5:
ERROR (duplicate_label): /soc/codec: Duplicate label 'lpass_codec' on
/soc/codec and /soc@...odec
ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:285:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtb] Error 2


The bisect tool pointed to,

b979ffa8bbd6e4c33df7f3e7ac3d63f2234c023c is the first bad commit
commit b979ffa8bbd6e4c33df7f3e7ac3d63f2234c023c
Author: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Date:   Tue Sep 21 17:21:18 2021 +0200

    arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add unit name for /soc node



As it was reported here,
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYv5fnntoa1vzXp52=TSxCK=U8fV8J-AbE+WmKH1w4ebwg@mail.gmail.com/

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org