linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/154] 5.10.82-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:11:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/154] 5.10.82-rc1 review

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 06:27:43PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 24.11.2021 18:16, Naresh Kamboju пишет:
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 18:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.82 release.
> >> There are 154 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:56:36 +0000.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.82-rc1.gz
> >> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> >> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> greg k-h
> > 
> > Regression found on arm gcc-11 builds
> > As I have already reported,
> > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYskrxZvmrjhO32Q9r7mb1AtKdLBm4OvDNvt5v4PTgm4pA@mail.gmail.com/
> > 
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c: In function 'tegra_cpuidle_probe':
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c:349:38: error:
> > 'TEGRA_SUSPEND_NOT_READY' undeclared (first use in this function); did
> > you mean 'TEGRA_SUSPEND_NONE'?
> >   349 |  if (tegra_pmc_get_suspend_mode() == TEGRA_SUSPEND_NOT_READY)
> >       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >       |                                      TEGRA_SUSPEND_NONE
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > 
> > Due to the following patch,
> > 
> > cpuidle: tegra: Check whether PMC is ready
> > [ Upstream commit bdb1ffdad3b73e4d0538098fc02e2ea87a6b27cd ]
> 
> Hi Greg and all,
> 
> Greg, could you please drop this patch from the stable trees? It
> shouldn't be backported since the actual offending patch which causes
> the "fixed" problem is still pending to be merged. I assumed that all
> patches would be merged much earlier when was typing the commit message,
> but only a part of patches were merged yet. Sorry for noticing this so late.

Now dropped from both 5.15 and 5.10 queues, thanks.

greg k-h